Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
USOP Liquidating LLC v. Mead-Hatcher, Inc.
as 1:2013mc00011
Plaintiff:
USOP Liquidating LLC
Defendant:
Mead-Hatcher, Inc.
Aldrich et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03815
Plaintiff:
Marie J. Aldrich, Leonel R. Alvarez, Sarah Arensman and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hatcher v. Heath
as 12-1416
Petitioner - Appellant:
Derrick Hatcher
Respondent - Appellee:
Philip D. Heath
Allen v. Professional Recovery Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Heidi M. Allen
Defendant:
Professional Recovery Services, Inc. and Alan Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hatcher v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv06365
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hatcher v. Moonves et al
as 1:2009cv08373
Plaintiff:
Curt Hatcher, Curt Hatcher, Curt Hatcher and others
Defendant:
Leslie Moonves, Sumner Redstone, Shari Redstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Campbell et al v. Watermark Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00657
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Campbell, Janis Borman, Diane M. Kaczorowski and others
Defendant:
Watermark Financial Services Group, Inc., Watermark M-One Holdings, Inc., M-One Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
French Bull L.L.C. v. Camo Vision of Georgia, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2009cv00949
Plaintiff:
French Bull L.L.C.
Defendant:
Camo Vision of Georgia, L.L.C. and Ashley Hatcher
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
