Cases 21 - 30 of 28,154
Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Nancy J Murphy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
George v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Marie George
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramos v. Shearman et al
as 6:2024cv06325
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ramos
Defendant:
Tina Shearman, Sarah Shearman, Racquel M. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connaughton v. Mount Vernon City School District
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
BERNARD J. CONNAUGHTON
Defendant:
MOUNT VERNON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMAL DOGGETT, Principal of Rebecca Turner Elementary School, THRUSHA HENDERSON, Assistant Principal of Rebecca Turner Elementary School and others
Burrell v. Bell
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
EARL BELL, Superintendent CCF, WEBB, Education Supervisor of CCF, KING, Deputy Superintendent of Programs and others
Santoro v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
John N. Santoro, Jr.
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Timothy D. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2024cv03962
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clark and J. C.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
