Cases 21 - 30 of 397
Griffin v. Barroga et al
as 3:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Chazantine Griffin
Defendant:
Marissa Barroga, Debra Cruz, Julie Leschinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Bloomfield, Jalisa X. Cuevas, Matthew T. Suplee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. New Haven CT, P.D. et al
as 3:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
New Haven CT, P.D. and CT State P.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abramovich v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01330
Plaintiff:
Matthew Abramovich
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Brian Vigor and Timiki Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Rutkowski et al
as 3:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ira Alston
Defendant:
Toby Rutkowski, Maurillo R. Amorim, Seth Laprey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wojick v. Nordin et al
as 3:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Wojick
Defendant:
Matthew Nordin and Star Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Matthews v. USA
as 3:2023cv01199
Petitioner:
John Matthews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fusco et al v. McLean et al
as 3:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
David Fusco and Matthew Fusco
Defendant:
GEORGE MCLEAN and Yarmouth Lumber, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
