Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McCall v. Saul
as 20-1914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anysha McCall
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
In Re: Kidd
as 3:2020cv00800
Respondent:
John Thomas Reynolds and Mark McCall
Petitioner:
Robert Gordon Kidd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
In Re: Kidd
as 3:2020mc00016
Petitioner:
Robert Gordon Kidd
Respondent:
John Thomas Reynolds and Mark McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Alaji et al v. Licata, Jr. et al
as 1:2020cv00153
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Kohnke, Collett May-Kirkland, Marcus K. Blackmon and others
Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, Roy's Plumbing, Inc., OP-Tech Environmental Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America v. Felton (James Felton)
as 19-3352
Defendant:
Tyrone Turner, AKA Skrap, Bradford Cannon, AKA Brad, Ezekiel Burley, AKA Ezekiel McCall, AKA Zeke, AKA Ziggy and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Felton
Freedom Mortgage Corporation v. McCall et al
as 2:2019cv05525
Defendant:
Christopher McCall and Christopher McCall, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07315
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Steck et al v. DiNapoli et al
as 1:2019cv05015
Plaintiff:
Phillip G. Steck, Janet Longo-Abinanti, John T. Mcdonald III and others
Defendant:
Scott Stringer, Thomas P. DiNapoli, H. Carl Mccall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Harvey v. McCall et al
as 1:2019cv03840
Defendant:
Tim Hanfield, Mark Hanfield, Frank Hanfield and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
