Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,687
Sango v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Bougoura Desire Sango
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Sgt Michael Marzoochi, Abdulrah Alzokari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Annucci
as 24-565
Plaintiff: RALPH HALL
Defendant: ANTHONY ANNUCCI, DOCCS Commissioner, in his official and personal capacity, PATRICK GRIFFIN, SUPERINTENDENT, GHCF Superintendent, in his official and personal capacity, DR. BENTIVENGA, GHCF Medical Supervisor, in his official and personal capacity and others
Anderson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff: Rajsean Anderson
Defendant: City of New York, Tyesha Robinson and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad et al v. Alto Pharmacy LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv11315
Plaintiff: Afiyfah Muhammad, Darwin Wilson, Dominique Skinner and others
Defendant: Alto Pharmacy LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 (names being fictitious and used to connote an unidentified person responsible for this occurrence), JANE DOES 1-10 (names being fictitious and used to connote an unidentified person responsible for this occurrence) and others
United States of America v. Approximately Five Hundred Forty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars and Zero Cents ($541,953.00) Seized from JP Morgan Chase Na Account Number 928805297 Held In The Name of Jiawig Trade Inc.
as 1:2023cv09585
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: APPROXIMATELY FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($541,953.00) SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE NA ACCOUNT NUMBER 928805297 HELD IN THE NAME OF JIAWIG TRAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Rivera v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: Jose Rivera
Defendant: City of New York, Manuel A. Garcia and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. The Real Property And Premises Known As 432 North Oakland Drive, Condominium Unit 103, Beverly Hills, California 90210, And All Proceeds Traceable Thereto
as 24-370
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: 73DT BUSINESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, 73D BUSINESS BUREAU, INC. and YOSEF MANELA
Defendant: THE REAL PROPERTY AND PREMISES KNOWN AS 432 NORTH OAKLAND DRIVE, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 103, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210, AND ALL PROCEEDS TRACEABLE THERETO, THE REAL PROPERTY AND PREMISES KNOWN AS 432 NORTH OAKLAND DRIVE, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 203, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210, AND ALL PROCEEDS TRACEABLE THERETO, ANY AND ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN STIFEL NICOLAUS & CO. ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING IN 9142, Held In The Name of 7D Business Bureau Inc., And all Proceeds Traceable Thereto and others
Campos v. ABC Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv09329
Plaintiff: Raul Antonio Jimenez Campos
Defendant: ABC Corporation, Nicholas Nuzzi, Jr. and ABC Corporation name of the corporation being fictitious and unknown to Plaintiff doing business as NDN Landscaping
Other: Patrick Michael McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ledesma v. New York City Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10632
Plaintiff: Frandi Ledesma
Defendant: New York City Police Department, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Nassau County and others
Cross Claimant: Dustin Genco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
John Doe v. Cook et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10362
Defendant: Aziz Beladel, Jay, Lindsay Cook and others
Plaintiff: Adnane Touzami and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?