Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 191
Vargas v. Kessler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00862
Plaintiff: Antonio Vargas
Defendant: C.O. Kessler, Derocco, John Doe #6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaws, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06721
Plaintiff: Kaws, Inc.
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint, bears2636 (73), Fuzhou Union Import And Export Co., Ltd. (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00711
Plaintiff: Leonidas Sierra
Defendant: John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuru (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05229
Plaintiff: Zuru (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. and ZURU Inc.
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, NurKar Retail (220), Shop910367226 Store (57) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
United States of America v. Rose (Wray)
as 22-1020
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Anthony Rose, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Nathaniel Coles, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Tara Rose, AKA Sealed Defendant 4 and others
Defendant / Appellant: Jelani Wray, AKA Sealed Defendant 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02556
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02556
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Demarest v. Underhill
as 22-956
Plaintiff / Appellant: David P. Demarest and David Parsons Demarest
Defendant / Appellee: Town of Underhill, a municipality and charter town, Daniel Steinabauer, as an individual and in official capacity as Selectboard Chair, Bob Stone, as an individual and in official capacity and others
Defendant: Front Porch Forum, as a Public Benefit 15 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 16 factual considerations while serving the traditional governmental role of providing 17 "Essential Civic Infrastructure" rangi and Jericho Underhill Land Trust, as NonProfit 21 Corporation fairly treated as acting under color of law due to past and present 22 factual considerations and a special relationship willfully participating in and 23 actively directing acquisition of mun
ToLife Technologies Pty Ltd et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02749
Plaintiff: ToLife Technologies Pty Ltd and Moshe Maor
Defendant: The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint, globebestdeal, homefromgoods and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
United States of America v. Rose (Blue)
as 22-657
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Anthony Rose, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Jelani Wray, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Nathaniel Coles, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant / Appellant: Leon Blue, AKA Sealed Defendant 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?