Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Johnson v. BBQ Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07450
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
BBQ Holdings, Inc., Jeffery Crivello, Charles Davidson and others
Lawrence v. BBQ Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07468
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
BBQ Holdings, Inc., Jeffery Crivello, Charles Davidson and others
Stein v. BBQ Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07206
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
BBQ Holdings, Inc., Jeffery Crivello, Charles Davidson and others
Cyrus v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04115
Plaintiff:
Odette K. Oliver Cyrus
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Mr. Duane Baldwin, Mr. Douglas Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Booker et al v. Price et al
as 1:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Darien I. Booker and Rachael M. Cunningham
Defendant:
David Price and Michael Napierala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickland v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01554
Plaintiff:
Allison C Wickland
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Darinka Maldanado, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Sunrise Brands LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Ashley Johnson
Defendant:
Sunrise Brands LLC, Diane Gilman Jeans LLC and Rachael Barnard
Albert et al v. Nurture Inc.
as 1:2021cv08030
Plaintiff:
MEAGAN ALBERT, ANGELA ARROWSMITH, ELIZABETH AUSTIN and others
Defendant:
Nurture Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Wamai v. Industrial Bank of Korea
as 21-1956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Winifred Wairiumu Wamai, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Adam Titus Wamai, Titus Wamai, Diana Williams and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Industrial Bank of Korea
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
