Cases 21 - 30 of 32
United States of America v. Torres (Jermaine Mingo)
as 12-136
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Torres, Yadira Polanco, Juan P. Montalvo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jermaine Mingo, AKA V.I.P.
United States of America v. Torres et al (Shenoll Bruno)
as 11-4634
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Torres, Yadira Polanco, Juan P. Montalvo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Shenoll Bruno, AKA Ambush
Rowley v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv06045
Plaintiff:
Tyron Rowley
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Torres (Gonzalez)
as 10-4326
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Torres, Yadira Polanco, Juan P. Montalvo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jean C. Gonzalez
Schwasnick v. Field
as 10-3095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carol Schwasnick and Peter Schwasnick
Defendant - Appellee:
Ginny Fields, individually and in her capacity as Assemblywoman of the State of New York, Assembly of the State of New York, Town of Islip and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jitta v. Polstein et al
as 2:2009cv02868
Plaintiff:
Kendall Jitta
Defendant:
Mark Polstein, Rowley and County of Nassau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schwasnick et al v. Fields et al
as 2:2008cv04759
Plaintiff:
Carol Schwasnick and Peter Schwasnick
Defendant:
Ginny Fields, The Assembly of the State of New York, The Town of Islip and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bee v. C.O. Krupp et al
as 1:2008cv10141
Plaintiff:
Martel Bee
Defendant:
C.O. Krupp, C.O. Krupp, Sgt. Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rowley v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv04179
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rowley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
