Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Strozier et al v. United States et al
as 9:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
Patrick Strozier, Stanley Dehart, III, Larry Allen and others
Defendant:
The United States, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Great Britain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. State of South Carolina Dept. of Corr.
as 1:2012cv00792
Petitioner:
Michael Singleton
Respondent:
State of South Carolina Dept. of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. United States et al
as 9:2011cv01437
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
United States, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Great Britain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Gordon v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv03577
Plaintiff:
Jimmy A. Gordon
Defendant:
L.B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, Gerold R. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford et al v. State of New York et al
as 9:2008cv01287
Petitioner:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Edgar Castro, Sr., Carnell Davis and others
Respondent:
State of New York, State of New Jersey, State of N. Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schulz et al v. State of New York et al
as 1:2007cv00943
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Schulz, Doug Bersaw, Amanda Moore and others
Defendant:
State of New York, State of New Hampshire, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
