Cases 21 - 30 of 281
Knights v. Vermont et al
as 5:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Brianna Knights
Defendant:
State of Vermont and Northeast Kingdom Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke v. Touchette
as 22-1028
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Thomas Burke
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Touchette, Commish, VT DOC, State of Vermont and David E. Tartter, Esq., Assist. Attorney General
Burke v. Touchette
as 22-896
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Thomas Burke
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Touchette, Commish, VT DOC, State of Vermont and David E. Tartter, Esq., Assist. Attorney General
State of Vermont v. Bohnett et al
as 5:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Vermont
Defendant:
Dominic Bohnett, Telecom Carrier Access, LLC doing business as TCA VOIP and Telecom Carrier Access, Inc. doing business as TCA VOIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Annis v. Federal Prosecutors State of Vermont et al
as 2:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Defendant:
Federal Prosecutors State of Vermont, Tristram Coffin, Gregory L. Waples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Vermont, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Olynthea Johnson
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Department of Corrections, Robert Wright, Sirena Zahn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-88
Petitioner:
Multi-State Governmental Entities Group
Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
