Cases 21 - 30 of 57,082
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1500
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Village of Scarsdale, New York v. Internal Revenue Service
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
VILLAGE OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Wimberly v. James
as 24-1502
Plaintiff:
JASON WIMBERLY
Defendant:
LETITIA JAMES, In her capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York and ALVIN BRAGG, In his capacity as District Attorney of the County of New York
Raphael v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Felicia Raphael
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Berman v. United States Tennis Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04206
Plaintiff:
Jake Berman
Defendant:
United States Tennis Association, Inc., Mojo Art & Image, LLC and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hinton v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Jordan Hinton
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Daniel Dougherty, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Brown
as 24-1482
Defendant:
DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scales v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
as 24-1483
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCALES
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT
United States of America v. Perez
as 24-1484
Defendant:
JEREMIAH PEREZ and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1489
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MAEVE E. HUGGINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
