Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Garnsey v. Shaw et. al.
as 2:2021cv00627
Defendant:
Mark J. Manoff, David E. Shaw, Philip A. Laskawy and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Garnsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Garnsey v. Shaw et al
as 1:2021cv00627
Defendant:
MARK J. MANOFF, DAVID E. SHAW, Philip A. Laskawy and others
Plaintiff:
JACK GARNSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spence v. Atkins et al
as 3:2021cv00086
Defendant:
Jhon Doe, Atkins and Portolo
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Spence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Chappius, Jr.
as 20-3914
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ukiah Atkins
Respondent / Appellee:
Paul J. Chappius, Jr., Superintendent
In re Micro Focus Internationa
as 20-3686
Defendant / Appellee:
Silke Scheiber, Darren Roos, Giselle Manon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Iron Workers Local No. 25 Pension Fund
Plaintiff:
David Schmitt
Vecchio v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
as 20-3571
Plaintiff:
Crystal Rumph, Sierra Trimble, Danielle Chickos and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ExamOne LLC, Quest Diagnostics, Inc. and ExamOne World Wide, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Vecchio, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McAdams et al v. Eastman Kodak Company et al
as 1:2020cv06861
Plaintiff:
Jimmie A. McAdams and Judy P. McAdams
Defendant:
James V. Continenza and Eastman Kodak Company
Petitioner:
Broward Motorsports Holdings LLC, Domenic Pesce, John McCullan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
