Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Woolf v. Strada
as 19-860
Defendant / Appellee:
Mathew Asman, Individually, Andrew Bowyer, Individually, Melissa Strada, Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Woolf
Defendant:
Gary Kotovets
Doe v. Bloomberg L.P.
as 1:2019cv02920
Defendant:
Bloomberg L.P.
Plaintiff:
Captain JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Nastasi & Associates, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv12361
Defendant:
Ronald Olson, Donaldson Acoustics, Co. Inc., Fay Devlin and others
Plaintiff:
Nastasi & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Craig v. Getty Images (U.S.), Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09916
Plaintiff:
Glen Craig
Defendant:
Getty Images (U.S.), Inc., CNN America Inc., NBCUniversal Media, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stets v. Securian Life Ins. Co. et al
as 1:2017cv09366
Plaintiff:
Milica J. Stets
Defendant:
Securian Life Ins. Co. , Bloomberg L.P. , John Stets and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Palin v. The New York Times Company
as 17-3801
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Buzzfeed, Inc., Home Box Office, Inc and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The New York Times Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sarah Palin, an individual
Roseman v. Bloomberg, L.P.
as 17-3195
Petitioner:
Bloomberg L.P.
Respondent:
Alexander Lee, Eric Michael Roseman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and William Van Vleet
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.