Cases 31 - 40 of 489
SL-X IP S.A.R.L. v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Credit Suisse Group AG, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and others
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff:
Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant:
UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SL-X Trading Europe Limited, et al v. Bank Of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2019cv04885
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC, EquiLend Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SL-x Trading USA LLC, SL-x Technology UK Ltd., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Axiom Investment Advisors, LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv02973
Defendant:
Portigon AG, Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Axiom Investment Advisors, LLC, Axiom HFT LLC, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv04233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 5514 Debt Collection Act of 1982
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
Iosilevich v. MSC Cruises (USA) et al
as 1:2022cv01897
Plaintiff:
FELIKS IOSILEVICH BY POA ILYA FELIKSOVICH IOSILEVICH and Feliks Iosilevich
Defendant:
MSC CRUISES (USA), MSC CRUISES S.A., RICHARD SASSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant:
Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
