Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Savage et al v. Azar
as 3:2018mc00074
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Gary Goodman, Christina Alexander, Mary Smith and others
Plaintiff:
James Mulcahy, Denise Rugman, Shirley Burton and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, III
Interested Party:
Holy Name Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Savage et al v. Azar,III
as 1:2018mc00264
Plaintiff:
Michael Savage, Lee Barrows, George Renshaw and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Loretta Jackson, Christina Alexander, Mary Smith and others
Defendant:
Alex M Azar,III
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Young v. Duncan
as 18-1775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael A. Young
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Duncan, William Utermarck, Timothy Begley and others
Young v. Duncan et al
as 3:2018cv00857
Defendant:
Thomas Duncan, William Utermarck, Timothy Begley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case name not on file
as 2:2018cv00395
ThirdParty Defendant:
A Furr-Ever Home, Inc., A Furr-Ever Home, Inc., Joyce Barrows and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Town of Hempstead and Town of Hempstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrow v. R.M.S.C. Department Transportion et al
as 1:2017cv09571
Plaintiff:
Pamela Barrow
Defendant:
R.M.S.C. Department Transportion and New York City Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Cadwallader v. Devlin, Jr.
as 17-2293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adrien Cadwallader
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard J. Devlin, Jr., County of Otsego, Adam Pierce and others
Defendant:
Patrick Laporte
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
