Cases 31 - 40 of 228
Tolbert v. Syracuse Police Dept et al.
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Latisha Nicole Tolbert
Defendant:
Sgt Cazzolli, Terell Irvine, Picotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Perry (Padilla)
as 21-1998
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Damien Perry, AKA Primo and Cecil Stanley
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Padilla, AKA Twin
Hanks v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hanks
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Kenton Buckner, Deputy Chief Richard Trudell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
In re: 650 Fifth Avenue and Re
as 21-1827
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller, Elena Rozenman, Noam Rozenman and others
Petitioner:
Lucille Levin and Suzelle M. Smith, Trustee of the Jeremy Isadore Levin 2012 Revocable Trust as Amended
Claimant:
Steven A. Hegna, Lynn Marie Hegna Moore, Craig H. Hegna and others
Defendant:
ASSA Corporation
United States of America v. Bouskila
as 1:2021cv04243
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cecile Bouskila
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5221 Foreign Bank Account Penalties
United States of America v. Bouskila
as 2:2021cv04243
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cecile Bouskila
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5221 Foreign Bank Account Penalties
Ciccotelli v. MMA Capital Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06423
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
MMA Capital Holdings, Inc., Michael Falcone, Frederick Puddester and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
