Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kaminski v. Markham et al
as 5:2013cv01478
Plaintiff:
Lois Kaminski
Defendant:
Joseph P. Markham, M.D. , St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Elaine J. Shaben, N.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bell v. Bosco
as 13-1010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Amar Bell
Defendant - Appellee:
Maureen Bosco, Executive Director; CNY PC
Tafari v. Hogan
as 12-4304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant:
Diane Vanburen, Deputy Commissioner, DOCS
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Hogan, Commissioner, Office of Mental Health, Donald Sawyer, Executive Director of CNY Psychiatric Center, Jean Berggren, Psychiatrist II, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Morales v. NYS Department of Labor
as 12-3331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deborah L. Morales
Defendant:
CNY Works, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
NYS Department of Labor, Division of Employment Services
Anderson v. CNY-Comproller
as 1:2012cv01773
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Anderson
Defendant:
CNY-Comproller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 12-410
Appellant:
Central New York Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, Construction Employers Association of CNY, Inc., Roofers' Local 195 Health & Accident Fund and others
Appellee:
Irving H. Picard and Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Claimant:
Margaret H. Brown, Nancy S. DeNero, Sally S. Beaudette and others
Intervenor:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
