Cases 31 - 40 of 190
United States of America v. Daniels
as 22-2012
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marquis Daniels, AKA Sealed Defendant
Williams v. Stuart et al
as 6:2022cv06336
Plaintiff:
Marquis Williams
Defendant:
C.O. J. Stuart, C.O. J. Brayette, C.O. J. Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Smith
as 1:2022cv06482
Plaintiff:
Marquise Williams
Defendant:
Marquis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Smith
as 1:2022cv04287
Plaintiff:
Marquise Williams
Defendant:
Marquis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Isreal (Jones)
as 22-1390
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marquis Isreal, AKA Garf, Asante Gaines, AKA Santi, Destine Calderon and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Laheem Jones, AKA Heemie
Williams v. Smith
as 9:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Marquise Williams
Defendant:
Marquis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Isreal (Gaines)
as 22-1324
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marquis Isreal, AKA Garf, Destine Calderon, Diomie Blackwell, AKA Yamo and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Asante Gaines, AKA Santi
United States of America v. Isreal (Benejan)
as 22-1160
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marquis Isreal, AKA Garf, Asante Gaines, AKA Santi, Destine Calderon and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jacquon Benejan, AKA Blick
Kinnel v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kinnel
Defendant:
State of Connecticut and Gerald Valletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Isreal (Blackwell)
as 22-674
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marquis Isreal, AKA Garf, Asante Gaines, AKA Santi, Destine Calderon and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Diomie Blackwell, AKA Yamo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
