Cases 31 - 40 of 807
Portillo v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv10237
Plaintiff:
Minerva Portillo
Defendant:
Terry Richardson, Trump Model Management LLC, T-Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
DeLuca v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09726
Plaintiff:
ROUSZ DELUCA
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, KEVIN AGRO, FNU Mellusi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Care One, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
as 23-7475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARE ONE, LLC, HEALTHBRIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC, CARE REALTY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, an agency of the United States, LAUREN MCFERRAN, in their capacities as Members of the National Labor Relations Board, GWYNNE WILCOX, in their capacities as Members of the National Labor Relations Board and others
GIC Re, India, Corporate Member Limited v. Tyson International Company, Ltd.
as 1:2023cv09175
Plaintiff:
GIC Re, India, Corporate Member Limited (as the corporate capital provider for Syndicate 1947 at Lloyd's for the 2021 and 2022 years of account) and GIC Re, India, Corporate Member Limited
Defendant:
Tyson International Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201 Enforcement of Convention
Lawless v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09106
Plaintiff:
Thorn Lawless
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Deputy Inspector Daniel McGee, NYPD Officer Diarmuid O'Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moshir v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2023cv08967
Plaintiff:
Al Moshir
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, NYS Attorney General, NYC Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ferguson v. City of New York
as 23-1315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rashaun Ferguson
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Michael Gildea and Detective Jaeger
Defendant:
Unidentified Members of the NYPD, all sued herein in their individual capacities
Massapequa Union Free School District et al
as 2:2023cv07041
Plaintiff:
Massapequa Union Free School District, Massapequa Union Free School District Board of Education and EANINE CARAMORE, in her capacity as a Board of Education Member and A Resident/Parent of the School Community
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen, et. al., All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC, All Contract Rights, Interest in and any Payments due on Michael Luehrsens 10% Class A membership interest in C3 Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
O'Neill v. Republic of the Sudan
as 23-1300
Plaintiff / Appellee:
C.I. O'Neill, as the Personal Representative and individually as surviving spouse of John P. O'Neill, Sr., and of the Estate of John P. O'Neill, Sr., deceased, and on behalf of all survivors and all legally entitled beneficiaries and family members o, J.P. O'Neill, Jr., individually, as surviving child of John P. O'Neill, Sr.; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and C. O'Neill, individually, as surviving child of John P. O'Neill, Sr.; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Ministry of the Interior, Agencies and Instrumentalities of the Republic of the Sudan, Ministry of Defense, Agencies and Instrumentalities of the Republic of the Sudan, Security of the Revolution, Agencies and Instrumentalities of the Republic of the Sudan and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Republic of the Sudan, Agencies and Instrumentalities of the Republic of the Sudan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
