Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sumrall v. Peter Young Residence, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01133
Defendant:
Peter Young Residence, Inc. and CEO Peter Newkirk
Plaintiff:
Bradley A. Sumrall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund v. 1068 Winthrop Owner, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00599
Defendant:
264 Realty Owner LLC, Wyona Realty Owner LLC, Glenn Realty Owner LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
Michel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11311
Plaintiff:
Luigi Nasti, Lenora Moody, Richard Mirabell and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gary Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Newkirk v. Newburgh Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv10277
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, District Attorneys Office and Newburgh Police Department
Plaintiff:
Tyler Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Newkirk v. USA
as 1:2017cv01077
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rasheen Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newkirk v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2017cv02960
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Christopher A. McCoy and Mark Pav
Plaintiff:
Latoya Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
