Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 119
France v. Dorch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv09881
Plaintiff: Cleament France
Defendant: Police Officer Luis Angeles, Police Officer William Rojas, Police Officer Fred Dorch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Warren
as 19-2321
Defendant: Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester Police Department, Cassie Kocher, Assistant District Attorney and others
Defendant / Appellee: Officer William Danno, Investigator Andrew Mackenzie and Officer Kevin Flannigan
Plaintiff / Appellant: Angel L. Hernandez
Almonte-Planco v. Baker et al
as 6:2019cv06557
Defendant: Officer William Baker, Officer Hernandez, One Unknown RPD Officer and others
Plaintiff: Felipe Almonte-Planco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassan v. Reynoso et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv05938
Defendant: Warden Raleem Moses, Nurse Jane Doe, Commissioners and Supervisors John and Jane Liability and others
Plaintiff: Eslam Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Lee
as 19-928
Defendant: Officer Schadel, Sergeant Lifield, Eastern New York Correctional Facility, Sergeant Bradley, Eastern New York Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee: Officer Robert O. Williamson, Eastern New York Correctional Facility, Officer Santiago Cruz, Eastern New York Correctional Facility, Officer Stuart Miller, Eastern New York Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Javell Fox
Franco v. City of Syracuse We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-891
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mario Franco
Defendant / Appellant: Police Officer John Gunsalus, 0453, all sued herein in their capacity as individuals and Police Officer Shawn Kelly, 279, all sued herein in their capacity as individuals
Defendant: Unidentified Syracuse Police Officers, all sued herein in their capacity as individuals, Police Officer William Lashomb, all sued herein in their capacity as individuals, City of Syracuse and others
Barnett v. Diaz
as 19-731
Defendant / Appellee: Sergeant P. Diaz, Corrections Officer Prescott, Corrections Officer Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lafvorne Levi Barnett
Basile v. New York City, NY
as 19-386
Defendant: New York City Police Officer James P. O'Neill, in his personal and official capacity as Chief of Police of New York City (the "Commissioner") was, upon information and belief, the New York City Police Commissioner at all the times relevant to this co, John Does 2-10, individually and in their capacities as employees and/or agents of The Madison Square Garden Company and Angele Delrosso, in her individual and official capacity as an employee, or former employee of the Madison Square Garden Company
Defendant / Appellee: John Does 1-9, individually and in their capacities as employees and/or agents of the Madison Square Garden Company, Madison Square Garden Company, an entity formed under the laws of the State of Delaware, New York City Police Officer William Dottavio, Shield 994, in his official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher Basile
Almeida v. New York State et al
as 1:2019cv00951
Defendant: Warden Spalding, New York State, Governor Cuomo and others
Plaintiff: Leonardo Almeida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaheed v. The City of New York
as 19-90
Defendant: Police Officer William Morris, James Doe, New York City Police Detective (fictitious name); in an individual and official capacity, Police Commissioner James O'Neill and others
Defendant / Appellee: Paul Bliss, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity, Jonathan Rodriguez, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity, Lydia Figueroa, New York City Police Officer; in an individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Daghrib Shaheed
Plaintiff: Waheedah Shaheed

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?