Cases 31 - 40 of 281
United States of America v. Lavanture
as 22-221
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamur Pharmes
Defendant / Appellant:
Jean R. Lavanture, AKA Rudy Lavanture, AKA J.R., AKA J.R. Rockefeller
Rivas v. Miller
as 22-153
Petitioner:
Rudi Rivas
Respondent:
Mark Miller, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility
Meji Bonilla v. Garland
as 21-6650
Petitioner:
RUDY ALBERTO MEJI BONILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas v. Miller
as 2:2021cv07041
Petitioner:
Rudi Rivas
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zelaya Ayala et al v. Gold Coast Detailing Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv06101
Plaintiff:
Sergio Danilo Zelaya Ayala, Carlos Rodriguez, Lorenzo Romero Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Gold Coast Detailing Inc. and James Belmonte
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Clinger et al v. Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC
as 3:2021cv01040
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clinger, Monica Barba and Heather Rudy
Defendant:
Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendoza v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv05649
Plaintiff:
Rudy Mendoza
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freud v. The New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2021cv02281
Plaintiff:
Abraham Freud
Defendant:
Rudy E Giuliani, The New York City Department of Education, Marjorie Dalrymple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desir v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv02181
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rudy Desir
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Velasquez (Mason)
as 21-546
Defendant:
Christopher Kittrell, AKA Frog, Lincoln Godoy, Mario Rodriguez and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Irving Mason, AKA Spidey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
