Cases 41 - 50 of 219
Four Seasons Produce, Inc. v. Fridge No More Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01388
Plaintiff:
Four Seasons Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Fridge No More Inc., Pavel V. Danilov, Anton Gladkoborodov and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Bailon v. QSR Management LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00879
Plaintiff:
Adriana Jaramillo Bailon
Defendant:
QSR Management LLC, Hylan-Quintard LLC, Rossville Woodrow LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Herrod v. Wolcott
as 1:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
Antone Herrod
Respondent:
J. Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heise II v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 21-3091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Anton Heise, II
Defendant / Appellee:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), Lisa Hubbard, Amtrak and Kevin Graham
Harris v. Meyer
as 21-2590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Beverly M. Harris, Dr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Maria S. Meyer, Owner of Inter-Global Aviation, Anton Meyer, Manager/Operator of Inter-Global Aviation and Rosa Meyer, Manager/Operator
Parmar v. QAD Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04974
Plaintiff:
Himanshu Parmar
Defendant:
QAD Inc., Peter R. van Cuylenburg, Anton Chilton and others
Rodriguez v. Rotaru-Barac et al
as 1:2021cv06736
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Anton Rotaru-Barac and A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au
Whitfield v. QAD, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06674
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
QAD, Inc., Anton Chilton, Pamela M. Lopker and others
Stein v. QAD Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06586
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
QAD Inc., Peter R. van Cuylenburg, Pamela M. Lopker and others
Demarest v. Underhill et al
as 2:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Barbara Yerrick, Town of Underhill, Carolyn Gregson and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Demarest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
