Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Fox v. Department of Correctional and
as 18-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Fox
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin, Superintendent Jeffrey Tedford, Probation Officer Pete Sigler and others
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Board of Parole Counsels Office, Eastern Correctional Facility, Adirondack Correctional Facility and others
Lopez et al v. New York State Board of Parole et al
as 1:2018cv03493
Defendant:
Shaw, Mayra I. Lopez, New York State Board of Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adsit v. Annucci
as 18-963
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jamison Adsit
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Respondent - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Tina M. Stanford, Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole
Washington v. State of New York Board of Parole et al
as 9:2018cv00220
Respondent:
Michael Mchale, State of New York Board of Parole and Megan Hickey
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Washington and Kenneth Lamar Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lackwood v. Stanford
as 17-2217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Lackwood, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Tina Stanford, Individually and as Chairperson of the New York State Board of Parole, G. Hallerdin, individually and as members of the New York State Board of Parole, S. Thompson, individually and as members of the New York State Board of Parole and others
McCray v. State of New York
as 17-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cerious McCray, 3rd Party Interpleader CeriousDelmarr McCray, individually & on behalf of the U.S., State of N.Y., themselves, including any & all minorities, taxpayers & individuals traveling and/or cohabiting with minorities & parolees in Orange County,
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, as a Government Unit, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, of the State of New York, individually, Andrea W. Evans, Chairwoman and others
Defendant:
Unnamed Campus Security Officer, of Mount Saint Mary College, individually and in their official capacities
Reyes v. United States Marshals Office
as 17-1970
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ciara Reyes, AKA Sheila Rivera
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, New York State Division of Parole, Oni Penzarvis, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Brian Fischer, former Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, in his individual capacity, Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, former Executive Deputy Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, and Counsel of New York State Department of Correctional Services, in his individ and Terrence X. Tracy, Chief Counsel for New York State Division of Parole, in his individual capacity
Flint v. Antoinette et al
as 1:2017cv04446
Plaintiff:
John Flint
Defendant:
Moravec Antoinette, Luces, Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCray v. State of New York
as 17-1688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cerious McCray, 3rd Party Interpleader CeriousDelmarr McCray, individually & on behalf of the U.S., State of N.Y., themselves, including any & all minorities, taxpayers & individuals traveling and/or cohabiting with minorities & parolees in Orange County,
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, as a Government Unit, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, of the State of New York, individually, Andrea W. Evans, Chairwoman and others
Defendant:
Unnamed Campus Security Officer, of Mount Saint Mary College, individually and in their official capacities
Zehr v. Stanford et al
as 9:2017cv00576
Plaintiff:
Roy Justin Zehr
Defendant:
Tina M. Stanford, Ellen E. Alexander, Sophie Whitin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
