Cases 41 - 50 of 540
Taylor v. New York State Dept. of Correction Employees et al
as 1:2022cv09747
Plaintiff:
Roy Taylor
Defendant:
Molina, NYCDOC Employees, John Doe Auburn Medical ADM & Health Care Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv09499
Plaintiff:
Chayanne Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of New York, Odali Cruz, Daniel Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canto v. BKCoin Management, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv08858
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alejandro Canto and Alejandro Canto
Defendant:
BKCoin Management, LLC, Mr. Carlos Betancourt, Mr. Kevin Kang and others
Receiver:
Michael I. Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Davis v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2022cv06207
Plaintiff:
Stanley Davis
Defendant:
Alexander H Gillespie, Timothy Gilmartin, Rapheal Pearl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Deem v. Schumer et al
as 7:2022cv08655
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Deem
Defendant:
Chuck Schumer, Jamaal Bowman, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coffman v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08622
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Lifshitz v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08564
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifshitz
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Bushansky v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08527
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Minzer v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08540
Plaintiff:
Shoshana Minzer
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle Armbrester and others
Bruton v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08425
Plaintiff:
Karyn Bruton
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle Armbrester and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
