Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Flanagan v. McGowan et al
as 1:2018cv04664
Plaintiff:
Harley Flanagan
Defendant:
John McGowan and Maxwell Jayson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Brandjes v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2018cv03753
Plaintiff:
Jayson Brandjes
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01477
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tanzman v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jayson M. Tanzman
Defendant:
Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mathew et al v. SMZ Impex, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09870
Plaintiff:
Roy Mathew , Abdur Howlader and Jayson Yesudasan
Defendant:
SMZ Impex, Inc., Farm and Grocery, Inc., Kusum Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Smolen v. Nevins et al
as 1:2017cv07494
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Smolen, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Nevins, Vincent Tyre, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandjes et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2017cv06858
Plaintiff:
Jayson Brandjes , Marilyn Bolden , Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 17-2208
Plaintiff:
Marvins Georges, Francisco Mayorga, Katherine Flanagan and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maxcimo Scott, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Jay Francis Ensor, Christina Jewel Gateley and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Chipotle Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
