Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Dorchester Financial Holdings Corp. v. Hogan Lovells, US LLP et al
as 1:2015cv02811
Plaintiff:
Dorchester Financial Holdings Corp.
Defendant:
Hogan Lovells, US LLP and Esq. Lyndon Tretter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bolden et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2015cv01316
Plaintiff:
James Bolden , Roberta Chavez , Andre Davis and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Secard v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv00499
Defendant:
Hogan Lovells Us LLP and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Glen Secard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hew v. Walmart Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00176
Defendant:
Police Office Donald M. Costeleigh, Police Officer Joseph G. Kotak, Lovell Medley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rene Vaughn Hew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
United States of America v. Ray (Smith)
as 14-2764
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Avery Ray
Defendant - Appellant:
William Lovell Smith
Lovell v. Kaplan et al
as 7:2014cv03359
Plaintiff:
Heather Lovell
Defendant:
Sabina Kaplan, Fusco, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oyola et al v. Cadena Marin et al
as 1:2014cv03420
Plaintiff:
Maria Esther Oyola , Wai Han Lau , Nganchen L. Mar and others
Defendant:
Vidal Enrique Cadena Marin and ABC Corps. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
