Cases 41 - 50 of 287
Messina et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06561
Plaintiff:
Joseph Messina, Kaycie Hays, Maxwell Heider and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott et al v. Klein et al
as 6:2022cv06439
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Scott and Maxwell Boards
Defendant:
Matthew R. Klein, Joel C Wittman, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. VAALCO Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07869
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
VAALCO Energy, Inc., Andrew L. Fawthrop, George Maxwell and others
Montgomery v. VAALCO Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07934
Plaintiff:
Sean Montgomery
Defendant:
VAALCO Energy, Inc., Andrew L. Fawthrop, George W.M. Maxwell and others
Budhraja v. VAALCO Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07470
Plaintiff:
Ankush Budhraja
Defendant:
VAALCO Energy, Inc., Andrew L. Fawthrop, George Maxwell and others
Mayo v. Walker
as 1:2022cv05810
Petitioner:
Maurice Mayo, William Harris, Randolph Maxwell and others
Respondent:
Warden S. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Diaz
as 22-1327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lafvorne Levi Barnett
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. Bonnell, Prescott, C.O., J. Daddezio, C.O. and others
Defendant:
Sullivan CO, Sgt.
Maxwell v. Walker
as 1:2022cv06552
Petitioner:
Randolph Maxwell
Respondent:
S. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hare v. Rockwood
as 1:2022cv03190
Petitioner:
Mr. Maxwell Hare and Maxwell Hare
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Rockwood and Mark Rockwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Federal Insurance Company v. Pixarbio Corporation
as 22-705
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pixarbio Corporation, Francis Reynolds, Kenneth Stromsland and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mintz Fraade Law Firm P.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
