Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Economou v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2015cv00902
Plaintiff:
Thomas Economou
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Warden MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2015cv00460
Petitioner:
Mark Green
Respondent:
United States Attorneys Office and Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Warden MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2015cv00102
Petitioner:
Mark Green
Respondent:
U.S. Attorneys Office For NY and Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Warden of the MDC-Brooklyn
as 1:2014mc00262
Petitioner:
Alfredo Davis
Respondent:
Warden of the MDC-Brooklyn
Davis v. Warden of the MDC-Brooklyn
as 1:2014cv01159
Petitioner:
Alfredo Davis
Respondent:
Warden of the MDC-Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. MDC Brooklyn/US Marshals
as 1:2013cv04437
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn/US Marshals
Plaintiff:
Kyle Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv04438
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Doctors And Medical:
MDC Brooklyn
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Goldstein
as 13-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Winston Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
P. Goldstein, Doctor, M. Borecky, Doctor, K. Page and others
Majdanski v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2013cv04402
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Majdanski
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn and Rosa Gersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen v. Warden MDC Brooklyn
as 1:2012cv04908
Petitioner:
John E. Chen
Respondent:
Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
