Cases 41 - 50 of 786
Cataldi v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Russel Cataldi
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
Dunbar v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Dearl Dunbar
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
McDaniels v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
John McDaniels
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
Weiss v. IsoPlexis Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
IsoPlexis Corporation, Sean Mackay, John G. Conley and others
O'Dell v. Oak Street Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Oak Street Health, Inc., Mike Pykosz, Geoff Price and others
Gong v. Sarnoff et al
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Junwu Gong
Defendant:
Sarnoff M Stuart, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Carl M Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harter et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Mark Harter, Robert Baker, Christopher Henley and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
SM Merger/Arbitrage, L.P. et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2021cv08255
Plaintiff:
SM Merger/Arbitrage, L.P., SM Investors, L.P., SM Investors II, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Giovanni Caforio, Ph.D Vicki L. Sato and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd.
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Holli Myers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
