Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Salvador v. Conviser et al
as 1:2013cv05442
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Salvador
Defendant:
Daniel Conviser and State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Levesque v. State of NY et al
as 8:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Andre Levesque
Defendant:
State of NY, Clinton County Government Center, Town of Plattsburgh Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. City of NY et al
as 1:2013cv03319
Plaintiff:
Brenda Justice
Defendant:
City of NY, State of NY, ACS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Russ v. Darrell Chaver
as 13-1778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jamaal Russ, AKA Jamal Russ
Defendant - Appellee:
Darrell Chavers, AKA John Doe #1, John Doe #2, (Police Officer at 73 Pct.), John Doe #3, (Police Officer at 73 Pct.) and others
Biton v. Aventura et al
as 1:2012cv05426
Defendant:
ACLU, Aaronson Rapport Feinstein Deutch, Ann Friedfertig and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
People of the State of NY v. Best
as 1:2012cv07021
Plaintiff:
People of the State of NY
Defendant:
Hilary Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gamez v. NYC Docs and Commands et al
as 1:2012cv06138
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gamez
Defendant:
NYC Docs and Commands, Singleton, The State of NY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaman v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv05657
Plaintiff:
Shelton Beaman
Defendant:
Smith, Ferguson, Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koso v. The Attorney General of the State of NY
as 2:2012cv01723
Petitioner:
Linda A. Koso
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamez v. NYC DOC and Commands et al
as 1:2011cv06131
Defendant:
Warden Alexander Davis, Martin Horn, Municipality of N.Y. and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
