Cases 51 - 60 of 3,686
Rivera v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rivera
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Raeshon Kenneth Daniels
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept. of Correction, Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verity v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Michael Verity
Defendant:
John Doe, Juanita Scott, Mahboob Ashraf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Alexander Vasquez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shand v. Burgos et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Defendant:
Ruben Burgos, Mark Bounaventure, Jamal Linen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Enrique Colon and Toliver
Defendant:
Semple and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Rodriguez v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serri v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
John A Serri
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Radice v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Radice
Defendant:
John Doe and Waterbury Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
