Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 20-4103
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv09354
Defendant:
NYPD Detective Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer Hansen, NYPD John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08004
Defendant:
Dustin Ridener, Santana, Jerry Ioveno and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sivokonev v. Zetsche et al
as 6:2020cv06065
Defendant:
Scott R Bieler, MBUSA LLC, West Herr Motors Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pavel Igorevich Sivokonev
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 502
Dietrich v. County Of Orange et al
as 7:2019cv10485
Defendant:
Correction Officer Michael Roman, Sheriff Carl E. DuBois, County Of Orange and others
Plaintiff:
Klaus Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dietrich v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04503
Defendant:
Special Officer John Does #1-3, Charles Parker and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Juliet Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc. v. Rustler Ranch, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00644
Defendant:
Rustler Ranch, Inc. and Philip H. Dietrich
Plaintiff:
Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
