Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Aquino v. GDK Food Enterprises Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06736
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Aquino
Defendant:
GDK Food Enterprises Inc., George Zamfotis and Gregory Zamfotis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Umana v. Rabsatt
as 2:2011cv04298
Respondent:
Calvin Rabsatt
Petitioner:
Jacinto Umana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pensado v. Makhdomi et al
as 1:2010cv07250
Plaintiff:
Octavio Pensado
Defendant:
Sabina Jabeen Makhdomi , CFNP, Jacinto Casas, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cedeno v. Conway
as 10-3351
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jacinto Cedeno
Respondent - Appellee:
James T. Conway
Rincon v. Pep Boys, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv06099
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Rincon
Defendant:
Pep Boys, Inc., Michael McSorley, Dan Salamone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Urbino et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2009cv09285
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Urbino and Yvette Urbino
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Aquino v. 30 Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2009cv08247
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Aquino
Defendant:
30 Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez v. N.Y. Police Dept. et al
as 1:2008cv07158
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Sanchez
Defendant:
N.Y. Police Dept., N.Y. Housing Authority, Frank Dantuano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aquino et al v. Mint Mint, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv06489
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Aquino and Eduardo Diaz
Defendant:
Mint Mint, Inc and Moshe Mallul
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramnath et al v. Jacinto-Francisco et al
as 1:2008cv02196
Plaintiff:
Radcliffe Ramnath and Riley Chandra Camille Ramnath
Defendant:
Gertrudes Jacinto-Francisco, Rosita Ulep, The Joseph P. Addabbo Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
