Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 606
Bridge Philanthropic Consulting, LLC, v. TD Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv10006
Plaintiff: Bridge Philanthropic Consulting, LLC,
Defendant: TD Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Corwin et al v. Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01436
Plaintiff: John Corwin, Robert Abrahams, Tonya Acosta and others
Defendant: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Karkare v. International Association of Bridge, Structural, O
as 22-2874
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nakul Karkare, M.D., Attorney in Fact on Behalf of Patient JN
Defendant / Appellee: International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 580
Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06789
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund, AFL-CIO Local 475 Health and Welfare Fund, Allied Security Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Karkare v. International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 580
as 2:2022cv05988
Plaintiff: Nakul Karkare, M.D.
Defendant: International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 580
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Contract Insurance
Haitian Bridge Alliance et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv08344
Plaintiff: Haitian Bridge Alliance, African Communities Together and UndocuBlack Network
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Golden Bridge LLC v. DGS18 Realty LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05857
Plaintiff: Golden Bridge LLC doing business as Golden Bridge Funding LLC
Defendant: DGS18 Realty LLC, Israel Dana and John Doe No. 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America, et al v. M/V One Apus, et al
as 1:2022cv08233
Plaintiff: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America,, Affliated FM Insurance Company, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty and others
Defendant: One, BDP Transport Inc., HMM and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Danmar Lines
Cross Claimant: Transpac Cargoline, New Chain Logistics Co Ltd, Samsung SDS Co Ltd and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: M/V ONE APUS, IMO no. 9806079, including its engines, boilers, tackle, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cross Defendant: Roes 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant: Orient Overseas Container Line, M/V One Apus in rem, ECU Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
DarkPulse, Inc. et al v. Crown Bridge Partners LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv08163
Plaintiff: DarkPulse, Inc., Social Life Network, Inc. and Redhawk Holdings Corp.
Defendant: Crown Bridge Partners LLC, Soheil Ahdoot and Sepas Ahdoot
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BAI et al v. New York city Regional Center, LLC
as 1:2022cv07378
Plaintiff: WEN BAI, George Washington Bridge Bus Station and Infrastructure Development Fund, LLC and GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE BUS STATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FUND, PHASE II, LLC
Defendant: New York city Regional Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?