Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Hewes v. Alabama Secretary of State et al
as 1:2019cv09158
Defendant:
Iowa Secretary of State, Connecticut Secretary of State, Florida Secretary of State and others
Plaintiff:
Henry F. Hewes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of New York v. Department of Energy
as 19-3652
Petitioner:
State of Maine, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Michigan and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy and Rick Perry, United States Department of Energy
State of New York et al v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 1:2019cv08365
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and Walter "Jay" Clayton III
Consolidated Plaintiff:
XY Planning Network, LLC and Ford Financial Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
State of New York v. United States Securities and
as 19-2893
Petitioner:
State of Delaware, State of California, State of Maine and others
Respondent:
Walter Clayton, III, in his official capacity as Chairman of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and United States Securities and Exchange Commission
State of New York v. National Highway Traffic
as 19-2395
Petitioner:
State of Delaware, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont and others
Respondent:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Heidi King, in her capacity as Deputy Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Elaine Chao, in her capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
State of New York et al v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al
as 1:2019cv05434
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Colorado, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Softbank Group Corp., T-Mobile US, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and others
Petitioner:
Charter Communications, Inc., Altice USA, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant:
Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York v. United States Department of Co
as 19-212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant:
Ron S. Jarmin, in his capacity as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Census Bureau, an agency within the United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the Census and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
