Cases 61 - 70 of 618
Johnson v. Watervliet Housing Authority
as 22-1944
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Watervliet Housing Authority, John McAvoy, Jr., Jami Bodo and others
Hayes v. Condlin et al
as 7:2022cv07295
Plaintiff:
Earl Hayes
Defendant:
Brady Condlin and Steven Schmoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hayes v. Everywhere Car Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04832
Plaintiff:
Angelique Hayes
Defendant:
Everywhere Car Service, Inc., Frunny Vrma and Pal Winder Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Jordan (Santos)
as 22-1714
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Santos, AKA Primo
Strong v. Watson et al
as 1:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Paul Strong
Defendant:
William Watson, Brian D. Seaman, Susan Bjornholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Washington
as 22-1465
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nicholas Washington, AKA Nicholas Hayes, AKA Face
Sabir v. Licon-Vitale
as 22-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rafiq Sabir
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Licon-Vitale, Warden, Adrian Hayes, S.I.S. Lt., Whitley, Captain and others
Gamble et al v. Rumpke Transportation LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Letisha Gamble and Letisha S. Gamble
Defendant:
Rumpke Transportation LLC, Russell Edward Hayes, Darnell W. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hayes v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
George G. Hayes
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Joseph Carter and Teressa Tynon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Clark et al
as 6:2022cv06255
Plaintiff:
Damecha Harris
Defendant:
Frank J. Clark, Michael J. Cooper, Fredrick J. Platek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
