Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Mahon v. IMS Health Inc
as 3:2013cv01192
Petitioner:
James Mahon
Respondent:
IMS Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. HS Products (IM Metal) XD40 Pistol et al
as 2:2013cv00167
Defendant:
HS Products (IM Metal) XD40 Pistol, Unknown Manufacturer 116MK1 Rifle, Mossberg 930 Shotgun and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
John M. Rosploch, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jin v. Holder
as 13-1664
Petitioner:
Xing Shu Jin, AKA Song Suk Im, AKA Song Sim
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Crawford et al v. Blue Ribbon Restaurant Management LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02221
Defendant:
Sean Sant Amour, Black Napkins, LLC, Blue Ribbon Restaurant Management II LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kelson Ayers, Anthony Borelli, Peter Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lou v. Trutex, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08120
Plaintiff:
Jian Jun Lou
Defendant:
Trutex, Inc. and Sun Im Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Im v. USA
as 1:2012cv07757
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Young Son Im
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Roberts v. TriPlanet Partners LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01222
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Roberts
Defendant:
TriPlanet Partners LLC , Sophien Bennaceur and Imed Bennaceur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Roberts v. TriPlanet Partners LLC et al
as 5:2012cv01222
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D Roberts
Defendant:
TriPlanet Partners LLC, Sophien Bennaceur and Imed Bennaceur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
