Cases 61 - 70 of 1,939
Asseng v. Beisel
as 24-700
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ASSENG
Defendant:
JOHN BEISEL, Nassau County Police Serial No. 7586, COUNTY OF NASSAU, JOHN DOE, Nassau County Police Officer and others
Carter v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01703
Plaintiff:
David Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Atkins et al
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Clarence Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Atkins, C.O. John Doe 1, C.O. John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peru v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
CRAIG PERU
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrow v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael Marrow
Defendant:
The City of New York, Kyle F. Flood, Nelson Nin and others
Other:
"John Doe" #4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradshaw v. Uhler
as 24-446
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
Corrections Officer WALRATH, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as John Does 4 and 6, Sergeant FLETCHER, Upstate Correctional Facility, TROMBLY, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as Trombley and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-427
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
Captain TOLMIE, BLEKIS, PELLITERI and others
Aigbekaen v. Gillepsie
as 24-428
Defendant:
WARDEN, WARDEN, FCI Danbury, GILLEPSIE, Lt., DURANT, Lt. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Vargas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Willie Vargas
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Barnett et al
as 7:2023cv10746
Plaintiff:
Andre Lee
Defendant:
Correction Officer Barnett, Correction Officer Russo, Correction Officer Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
