Cases 61 - 70 of 675
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Kodak Alaris Inc.
as 6:2022cv06480
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Kodak Alaris Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Roman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06681
Plaintiff:
Carlton Roman
Defendant:
The City of New York, Catherine Lomuscio, Detective William Pepey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Romero et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06564
Plaintiff:
Franchesca Romero, Nick Killacky, JessyKa Klenk and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
O'Dell v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09212
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint A. Lane, Bob Farrell and others
Keita v. Konax LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06379
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Defendant:
Konax LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Thomas et al
as 6:2022cv00980
Plaintiff:
Kailyn M. Lane
Defendant:
Scott Thomas and Bruce Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Lane v. Department of Justice
as 22-1910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark William Lane
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigations, National Archives and Records Adminstration and others
Defendant:
Esq. Peter J. Mollo
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Watchnet, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Watchnet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lane v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 22-1909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark William Lane
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
