Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,856
Ledesma v. Rikers Island Dept of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02211
Plaintiff: Elias Ledesma
Defendant: Rikers Island Dept of Corrections, Deputy Warden Mr. Brathwaite and Warden Ronald Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cato v. Westchester Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv02209
Plaintiff: Reynold Cato
Defendant: Westchester Medical Center, Mark Miller, Deputy Superintendent of Medical "T" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff: William Johnson
Defendant: Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner: Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent: Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DiPierro v. New York State Unified Court System
as 24-571
Plaintiff: PAUL DIPIERRO and MARIE ZWEIG
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, NEW YORK OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, JUSTIN BARRY and others
Smith v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff: Morgan Smith
Defendant: Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Keating v. Miller
as 24-542
Petitioner: MICHAEL KEATING
Respondent: MARK MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT
Celestine v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02060
Petitioner: Fritz Celestine
Respondent: Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?