Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Stokes v. Bedford Stuyvesant New Beginnings Charter School
as 1:2016cv04575
Defendant:
Bedford Stuyvesant New Beginnings Charter School
Plaintiff:
Stanley Stokes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stokes v. USA
as 6:2016cv06406
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frederick Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raritan Baykeeper Inc. v. Gaeta et al
as 1:2016cv00665
Defendant:
Cohiba Cont. Corp, Dennis Gaeta, Jeffrey Gaeta and others
Plaintiff:
Raritan Baykeeper Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Stokes v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00413
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Michael Hewitt, Police Officer Michael Izzo and others
Plaintiff:
Salim Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Corigliano et al v. Carchidi et al
as 7:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
Frank Corigliano and Susan Corigliano
Defendant:
Andrew J Carchidi and Shaun W Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. Lynch et al
as 6:2015cv06765
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Kubow, Kenneth E. Mathison, Harold W. Schroeder and others
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon, James B. Comey, Loretta E. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stokes v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02076
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Steven Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv10284
Plaintiff:
Jatiek Smith
Defendant:
City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Yolonda Canty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Board of Ed et al
as 1:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
Tina Rhodes
Defendant:
Board of Ed, School 31, Kim Donahou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Donell Ford Family et al
as 1:2014cv05597
Defendant:
Donell Ford Family, Social Security Office, Ms. Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Marie Prince
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
