Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 12-840
Plaintiff - Appellant: Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee: Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
State Of New York et al v. Jackson et al
as 1:2012cv01064
Plaintiff: State Of New York , State of California , State Of Connecticut and others
Defendant: Lisa P. Jackson and Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv09175
Plaintiff: Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Robert P. Kelly, Bruce W. Van Saun and others
Movant: Miami Firefighters' Relief and Pension Fund , Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds , DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant: Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee: Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Keeten v. State of Oregon
as 11-551
Plaintiff - Appellant: Patrick L. Keeten
Defendant - Appellee: State of Oregon
Keeten v. The State of Oregon
as 1:2010cv09432
Plaintiff: Patrick L. Keeten
Defendant: The State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff: Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee: The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00503
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
State of Connecticut et al v. USA et al
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff: State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: USA, Health & Human Svc and Michael O. Leavitt
Movant: State of New York, State of New York and Richard F. Daines
Intervenor Defendant: Christian Medical Association, Christian Medical Association, Christian Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Schulz et al v. State of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00943
Plaintiff: Robert L. Schulz, Doug Bersaw, Amanda Moore and others
Defendant: State of New York, State of New Hampshire, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?