Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Chalasani v. Daines et al
as 1:2010cv03259
Plaintiff:
Prasad Chalasani, M.D.
Defendant:
Richard F. Daines, M.D., Commissioner, Dept. Of Health (DOH) State Of NY, Keith W. Servis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05827
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roy v. 2 Democratic Senator of NYS Albany, NY et al
as 8:2009cv00688
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
2 Democratic Senator of NYS Albany, NY, NY State, Albany, NY, USA Government Washington, DC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Joyner-El v. State of NY Dept. of Corr. Servs et al
as 1:2009cv04885
Plaintiff:
William L. Joyner-El
Defendant:
State of NY Dept. of Corr. Servs and Arthur Kill Corr. Fac.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynoso v. The People of the State of NY et al
as 1:2009cv02111
Plaintiff:
Arturo Reynoso
Defendant:
The People of the State of NY and James Conway
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hudson v. Lindsay et al
as 1:2008cv04658
Petitioner:
Harvey J. Hudson
Respondent:
Cameron Lindsay, United States of America, United States Attorneys, NY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hewitt v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2008cv04120
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Hewitt
Defendant:
County of Suffolk and State of NY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lack v. State of NY Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2008cv06094
Petitioner:
Taesha Lack and Dianne Dyson
Respondent:
State of NY Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Krotoszynski v. People of the State of NY
as 1:2008cv03101
Plaintiff:
Wieslaw Krotoszynski
Defendant:
People of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donovan v. N.Y.P.D. et al
as 1:2007cv07127
Plaintiff:
William Donovan
Defendant:
N.Y.P.D., MSNBC, N.B.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
