Cases 81 - 90 of 247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Gattuso & Ciotoli, PLLC et al
as 1:2019cv01385
Defendant:
Jessica L. Lukasiewicz, TLC Utica, LLC, John A. Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Gattuso & Ciotoli, PLLC et al
as 1:2019cv08346
Defendant:
Jessica L. Lukasiewicz, TLC Utica, LLC, John A. Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Benson v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv07502
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kevin McAleena and others
Petitioner:
Kwesi Akosah Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Alayon et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11927
Plaintiff:
Xiao Hong Hui, Raul Rodriguez, Ronald Torres and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Abel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11253
Plaintiff:
Martin Berry, Gaetano Abramo, Manuel Bande and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Beverly v. County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2018cv01293
Defendant:
Deputy J.W. Manzer, Hon. Joel Abelove, Sarah E. Romano and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Beverly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Xerox Corporation v. Bus-Let, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv06725
Defendant:
Bus-Let, Inc., Post Haste Mailing Services, Inc., Mass Mail, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benson Mills, Inc. v. Kennedy International, Inc.
as 1:2018cv10281
Plaintiff:
Benson Mills, Inc.
Defendant:
Kennedy International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
The WOB Company, Inc. v. Friedman
as 1:2018cv07527
Defendant:
Benson Friedman
Plaintiff:
The WOB Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
