Cases 81 - 90 of 1,132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dixon v. Adams
as 23-799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaw-Nae Dixon, Thomas Casatelli, Jeanette Rivera and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Adams and City of New York
McFarlane v. Norville et al
as 7:2023cv03685
Plaintiff:
William A. McFarlane
Defendant:
Joseph Black Norville and Domalgo Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Montgomery v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc.
as 23-735
Plaintiff:
Donald Wood
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Montgomery, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Donald Wood, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Stanley Black & Decker Inc, DBA Craftsman
Black v. Rowe
as 7:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
Marcus Black
Defendant:
Devoy Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Chambers (Kidd)
as 23-6400
Defendant:
MARCUS CHAMBERS, Chino, Chi D and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DARNELL KIDD, Black, Donney and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
