Cases 81 - 90 of 160
Gulifield v. Donahue et al
as 1:2015cv00885
Plaintiff:
Jashaad Gulifield
Defendant:
Brendan Donahue, Kristen Conklin, Robert Shine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donahue et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 1:2014cv10200
Plaintiff:
Barbara Donahue and Robert Donahue
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. The Honorable Patrick D Donahue et al
as 1:2014cv10270
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pearson
Defendant:
The Honorable Patrick D Donahue, Post Master General and Chief Operating Officer of the United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv06953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
McKinney v. Fischer et al
as 6:2014cv06425
Plaintiff:
Darrell McKinney
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Albert Prack, G. Saj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hare v. Town of Mt. Kisco et al
as 1:2014cv05546
Plaintiff:
Thomas O. O'Hare
Defendant:
Town of Mt. Kisco, Michael Cindrich, Mark Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bunting v. Fischer et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bunting
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Albert Prack, Norman Bezio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03555
Defendant:
Corrine Downing, Raymond Endres and Kings Park Manor, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donahue Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Donahue v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
Patricia Donahue
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
