Cases 81 - 90 of 314
Liburd v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv01833
Defendant:
City of New York, Correction Officer Dafe, Timothy D. Farrell and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Liburd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gumora v. New York City Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv02300
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gumora
Defendant:
New York City Dept. of Corrections, Joseph Ponte, Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pizarro v. Bratton et al
as 1:2017cv01694
Defendant:
Devin Baker, Bill Bratton, Jamie Burke BDS and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reece v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv01582
Defendant:
Captain John Clarke, Correction Officers John Does, Captain John R. Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buckner v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv01952
Plaintiff:
Charles Buckner
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Yolanda Canty, John Doe (Chief) D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabian v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv01567
Defendant:
Correction Officer L. Taveras, Joseph Ponte and Ada Presley
Plaintiff:
Parish Fabian
Interested Party:
CORPORATION COUNSEL NYC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thawney v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2017cv01881
Plaintiff:
Reginald Thawney
Defendant:
City of New York , Joseph Ponte , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv01830
Plaintiff:
Vingal Carter
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte and Maxsolaine Mingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinks v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2017cv01363
Plaintiff:
Luziano Hinks
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Department of Correction Commissioner Joseph Ponte, Deputy Warden Jonelle Shivraj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
