Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Nemec v. Shrader et al
as 1:2009cv07466
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nemec
Defendant:
Ralph W. Shrader, C.G. Appleby, Samuel R. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Abreu v. Graham et al
as 9:2008cv00855
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Harold Graham, Brian Fischer, Lucien J. LeClaire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts et al v. New Haven et al
as 3:2008cv00670
Plaintiff:
Karen Roberts and Frank Roberts
Defendant:
City of New Haven, Francisco Ortiz, Jamie Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Strickland et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2008cv01649
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Strickland and Claudia Strickland
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, American Optical Corporation, Anchor Packing Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Vernon v. BOP (MDC Brooklyn) et al
as 1:2008cv01634
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Vernon
Defendant:
BOP (MDC Brooklyn), John Doe 1,2,3 and C.M. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
Arthur Bell, David Bowers, John David Brown and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv01034
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Stewart C. Hudson, G.W. Bush, A. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Hudson, et al
as 3:2007cv00218
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, G. W. Bush, A. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houghton v. Cardone, et al
as 6:2003cv06381
Plaintiff:
James R. Houghton
Defendant:
Daniel Lieutenant Daniel Culver, of the Orleans County Sheriff's Department , Erin Deputy Erin Fuller, of the Orleans County Sheriff's Department and Ken Deputy Ken Strickland, of the Orleans County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
