Cases 81 - 90 of 378
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrams v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Latisha D. Hamilton, Ernestine Gayle, as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.G., Kevaris Gregory and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, City of Niagara Falls, Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Weber v. Saul
as 1:2020cv05422
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Weber
as 20-3929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rasha Brown and Lloyd Watson
Defendant / Appellee:
Terence Weber and Stevens Transport, Inc.
Spence v. John or Jane Doe 1-10 et al
as 1:2020cv10090
Defendant:
City of New York, Kevin Weber and John or Jane Doe 1-10
Plaintiff:
Calvin Spence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Annucci et al
as 6:2020cv06816
Defendant:
Mindy Weber, Ann Marie Sulivan, Tricia Sweet and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acklin et al v. Eichner et al
as 1:2020cv07042
Plaintiff:
Jatinder K Aggarwal, John A Taylor, Susan O'Neill and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Rodney M Bickford
Defendant:
New York Urban Ownership Management LLC, Ian Bruce Eichner, O. Park Central LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
A.J. v. Weber
as 20-3356
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ardolf, Jacob Madden, Anthony Baldwin and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bruce Weber
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Buddy Krueger
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Weber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01238
Plaintiff:
Donald T. Weber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
